<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>michael-mccracken.net &#187; ipad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael-mccracken.net/tag/ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael-mccracken.net</link>
	<description>This is a weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tinkering in the Sideshow</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/02/tinkering-in-the-sideshow/</link>
		<comments>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/02/tinkering-in-the-sideshow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melancholy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tinkering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I chime in on the reactions to the iPad as a new wave of pleasantly functional but closed computing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <a href="http://al3x.net/2010/01/28/ipad.html">Alex Payne</a> and <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2010/01/29/tinkerers-sunset">Mark Pilgrim</a> both made some heartfelt arguments explaining why they think the fact that Apple&#8217;s vision of the computing future as a relatively closed appliance is depressing. I agree, and I want to explain exactly why, now that I think I&#8217;ve figured it out.</p>

<p>Each post got plenty of responses. Dissenters have a wide variety of reasons for why it&#8217;s no big deal, ranging from &#8220;tomorrows tinkerers will just play with different technology, like <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2010/01/29/tinkerers-sunset#comment-13600">bio-mecha</a>&#8221; (fascinating!), to a lot of people saying, essentially, &#8220;Just don&#8217;t buy the appliance if you want a computer&#8221; (obvious!).</p>

<p>Others have made a solid point that the iPad is the next big computing paradigm. Steven Frank calls it a <a href="http://stevenf.tumblr.com/post/359224392/i-need-to-talk-to-you-about-computers-ive-been">&#8220;New World&#8221;</a> device. I can&#8217;t help but agree, and of course powerful devices that empower instead of confuse the user are a good thing. Replacing most of the world&#8217;s overcomplicated, fussy laptops with focused and reliable devices is a good thing.</p>

<p>Of course, general purpose, hackable computers are not really going away, not soon. Even if everyone uses an iPad for personal stuff and a Chrome OS netbook to access private cloud services for business work, there will still be a need for workstations, and I hope the people building complete personal systems out of Free Software don&#8217;t give up.</p>

<p>However, in a response to comments on his post, <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2010/01/29/tinkerers-sunset#comment-13616">Mark Pilgrim made a gloomy prediction</a>: &#8220;People haven’t figured it out yet, but Mac OS X is on its last legs. By 2015, Apple will make appliances and developer add-ons. Not general purpose computing devices.&#8221;</p>

<p>If you ask me, this is the real problem.</p>

<p>The problem is that hackable computers <em>that I want to use</em> could very well be fading out. Maybe Mark&#8217;s overstating things, but I would not be surprised to see the Mac, and OS X, as a relatively low priority for Apple in the near future. Design and development effort and creativity will naturally go increasingly toward the more profitable platform &#8211; the one making computing finally pleasant for the normal person.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m worried that this will happen for third-party developers too. <a href="http://violasong.com/2010/02/my-worst-ipad-fears">I&#8217;m not the only one.</a> Back in 2002, Brent Simmons described developing user code for the Mac as <a href="http://inessential.com/2002/09/19/why_i_develop_for_mac_os_x">&#8220;the show&#8221;</a>. Is there any doubt that Apple&#8217;s mobile OS is &#8220;the show&#8221; now?</p>

<p>Where does that leave the rest of us who still have to or want to use a more powerful platform?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/02/tinkering-in-the-sideshow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
