<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>michael-mccracken.net &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael-mccracken.net/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael-mccracken.net</link>
	<description>This is a weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Software aging well vs. UI that triggers OCD</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/05/software-aging-well-vs-ui-that-triggers-ocd/</link>
		<comments>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/05/software-aging-well-vs-ui-that-triggers-ocd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had an idea the other day that I shared on Twitter:

@mikemccracken: It would be cool if there was a way for well-used &#038; loved GUI software to gracefully show its age, like a good leather wallet…

I still like this idea, and I loved the example that Bryan Knight replied with &#8211; the OS 8 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had an idea the other day that I shared on Twitter:</p>

<blockquote>@mikemccracken: It would be cool if there was a way for well-used &#038; loved GUI software to gracefully show its age, like a good leather wallet…</blockquote>

<p>I still like this idea, and I loved the example that <a href="https://twitter.com/skabaru">Bryan Knight</a> replied with &#8211; the OS 8 Color Picker crayons, seen in the third &#8220;Colour Selector&#8221; image on the <a href="http://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/macos80">OS 8 GUIdebook page</a>.</p>

<p>However, it just occurred to me that it&#8217;d be hard to design a UI that shows its age or use gracefully without looking &#8220;dirty&#8221; and triggering the kind of OCD that makes some of us empty the trash just because the icon looks full. I can think of a few other things that do that to me:</p>

<ul>
<li>Of course, the full trash can</li>
<li>Unread counts of all kinds</li>
<li>MS Word 08 showing &#8220;[Compatibility Mode]&#8221; in the window title for files that aren&#8217;t .docx format</li>
<li>Badges on files in the finder that show source control status &#8211; I tried this once and it drove me crazy</li>
</ul>

<p>There are probably more. Share yours in the comments if you like. I&#8217;d also be really interested in other examples besides the crayons where UI changes gracefully as you use the software more…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/05/software-aging-well-vs-ui-that-triggers-ocd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delight Innovation</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/04/delight-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/04/delight-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently seen the concept of delight in software brought up in a couple different places, and I just wanted to cheer it on.

Jesper at waffle is starting an open-source web browser project to revive the spirit of OmniWeb, called rouse. He coins the phrase &#8220;delight innovation&#8221;. I love that phrase. He&#8217;s talking about taking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently seen the concept of <em>delight</em> in software brought up in a couple different places, and I just wanted to cheer it on.</p>

<p>Jesper at <a href="http://waffle.wootest.net">waffle</a> is starting an open-source web browser project to revive the spirit of OmniWeb, called <a href="http://waffle.wootest.net/2010/04/18/rouse-involvement/">rouse</a>. He coins the phrase &#8220;delight innovation&#8221;. I love that phrase. He&#8217;s talking about taking a browser, something that&#8217;s relatively stable, and looking for ways to make it noticeably better again. I love that impulse &#8211; it&#8217;s something I&#8217;m hoping to see in email clients too.</p>

<p>Another place that delight showed up (along with Surprise and Joy), was at <a href="http://52weeksofux.com">52 weeks of UX</a> in a post called <a href="http://52weeksofux.com/post/531355592/design-for-delight">&#8220;design for delight&#8221;</a>. That post  seemed to be a little more about the parts of design that don&#8217;t affect functionality, but do add personality. I really agree with this angle too &#8211; I like a program that has little details that are <a href="http://borkware.com/quickies/single?id=319">just for fun</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael-mccracken.net/2010/04/delight-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Measuring PDFs with Skim</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2009/11/measuring-pdfs-with-skim/</link>
		<comments>http://michael-mccracken.net/2009/11/measuring-pdfs-with-skim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

I love it when I can guess how to do something new in a program.
Skim just did this for me &#8211; I needed to figure out how big the rectangle of text in a paper I&#8217;m working on is, in inches. I looked for rulers, and then decided I&#8217;d just see if I get any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://michael-mccracken.net/wp2/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/skimsnap.png" alt="Skim Measurement" title="Skim Measurement" width="210" height="128" class="alignright size-full wp-image-230" /></p>

<p>I love it when I can guess how to do something new in a program.
<a href="http://skim-app.sf.net">Skim</a> just did this for me &#8211; I needed to figure out how big the rectangle of text in a paper I&#8217;m working on is, in inches. I looked for rulers, and then decided I&#8217;d just see if I get any size feedback when I make a rectangular selection. Turns out there&#8217;s a nice feedback status line in the bottom right &#8211; clicking toggles between measurement in pts and in inches.</p>

<p>I like how this solves my problem without adding a lot of new UI for measurement &#8211; no rulers, no extra tool to measure length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael-mccracken.net/2009/11/measuring-pdfs-with-skim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With all the news about web fonts lately&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2009/07/with-all-the-news-about-web-fonts-lately/</link>
		<comments>http://michael-mccracken.net/2009/07/with-all-the-news-about-web-fonts-lately/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktopvswebapps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/2009/07/22/with-all-the-news-about-web-fonts-lately/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the news about web fonts lately, I&#8217;ve been thinking about typography as a difference between web apps and desktop apps. No one expects web apps to conform to any standard UI, so designers can experiment and give us distinctive interfaces, using different fonts and color schemes.

It seems like there&#8217;s less room to play [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the news about web fonts lately, I&#8217;ve been thinking about typography as a difference between web apps and desktop apps. No one expects web apps to conform to any standard UI, so designers can experiment and give us distinctive interfaces, using different fonts and color schemes.</p>

<p>It seems like there&#8217;s less room to play in desktop apps &#8211; you&#8217;ll see unique interfaces with new button styles, new controls, different color schemes, but as far as I can tell, not much variation in typography.</p>

<p>The only example off the top of my head is Panic Sans, used in Coda.</p>

<p>Why so little variation?</p>

<p>Is it the presence of a standard system font, UI guidelines, or just habit?</p>

<p>Is there a licensing issue for redistributing fonts with software? I tried to look for licensing terms, but this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a common question.</p>

<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind some more tasteful variation in my desktop apps &#8211; I think the best web apps have shown us that different isn&#8217;t always bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael-mccracken.net/2009/07/with-all-the-news-about-web-fonts-lately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
