<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photos, Buzz, 4th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael-mccracken.net/2006/07/photos-buzz-4th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2006/07/photos-buzz-4th/</link>
	<description>This is a weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2006/07/photos-buzz-4th/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/?p=52#comment-177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bibble looks like a pretty mature product. I&#039;d give it a try, but sadly I have to admit the main reason I started with Lightroom is that the beta is free...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bibble looks like a pretty mature product. I&#8217;d give it a try, but sadly I have to admit the main reason I started with Lightroom is that the beta is free&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Plummer</title>
		<link>http://michael-mccracken.net/2006/07/photos-buzz-4th/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Plummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/?p=52#comment-176</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tried Lightroom too, but ended up settling on Bibble. The workflow isn&#039;t quite as intuitive initially, but once you get the hang of it, I find it much faster, even on my aging iBook. I also find the quality of conversions to be superior with the default settings more of the time. It normally takes me a while to get Lightroom or CS2 to make my pics look right, but with Bibble it is pretty quick.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Lightroom too, but ended up settling on Bibble. The workflow isn&#8217;t quite as intuitive initially, but once you get the hang of it, I find it much faster, even on my aging iBook. I also find the quality of conversions to be superior with the default settings more of the time. It normally takes me a while to get Lightroom or CS2 to make my pics look right, but with Bibble it is pretty quick.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

